Day 11 of 366: "You mean that site isn't real?"

I spent the day with 8th graders, talking about web searching. I pointed out to them that they had been on the web about 13 years, and their teachers had been on the web… about 13 years.  They are growing up with the internet as a part of their lives, something they can’t imagine living without.

Microsoft Office Images

By 8th grade, students are learning the skills to differentiate between a good site and a poor one. Some of their research questions are getting so specific that databases may not have enough detail. But, a straight web search can yield literally millions of sources. The lesson became about how to search smarter. Yes, I’m a media specialist. And, yes, today I used the terms Wikipedia and Google. (You should have seen their eyes light up.)

I took students on a journey of my research process when I did History Day in the 90’s. I started with something called an encyclopedia. From a few well written paragraphs, I learned key words about my topic: Charles Lindbergh. Then I went off into other books and researched those key points. An online encyclopedia works much the same way, but the hyperlinks make expanding research much easier. I showed the Britannica  Lindbergh page. Then I showed the Wikipedia Lindbergh page. I talked about how the power in Wikipedia is also its weakness: the millions of editors that contribute. We discussed slanting in entries, as well as verifying any information found on the web.

google.com

With Google, I introduced them to some tips and operators that some had not seen before:

  • Use key words
  • Use “quotes”
  • -remove word
  • numeric..range

Their bonus tips included:

  • this OR that
  • filetype:ppt
  • ~similar words
  • define:plethora

The students are doing a mini research project, and a big part of the project is actually in the finding of good websites, rather than just finding information. The website rubric is broken down into a few areas. Here they are, along with the website that I fed out to the students to scan for each quality.

Who:

  • Author is clearly identified.
  • Author info indicates an author is an expert.
  • Complete contact info is provided.

The Taxonomy of Barney

What:

  • Type of info: fact, opinion, entertainment, sales
  • Domain (.edu, .org, .gov)
  • Business, organization or group is clearly identified

Cascadia

Where:

  • Sources of info are listed
  • Info can be verified
  • No errors in spelling/grammar

DHMO.org

BanDHMO.org

When:

  • Last update is clearly listed.
  • Updated within the last 12 months.
  • Sources published within last 5 years?
  • All links work and are up-to-date.

Historical Tornado

You would think by the 4th fake website, they would figure the 5th was fake, too. This activity produced some incredible talking points. The students learned to be critical of any site and look for those key indicators that the information may not be legitimate. I hope this carries over into their actual research.

Seeing this lesson in black and white on a blog post isn’t nearly as fun as watching it play out in real life. It is energizing to work with a generation so connected to technology, but also so willing to learn how to be responsible with finding information on the web.

How do you approach Google and Wikipedia with your students?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *